Newsgroups: workspace.we_want_bandwidth


previous    top    workgroup    thread    next


Subject: Global Information Networks Conference 97 - Users declaration
From: pit <pit@icf.de>
Date: Wed, 09 Jul 1997 20:49:42 METDST


* * * * *


http://www2.echo.lu/bonn/userdeclar.html



`Putting people's needs at the centre'
Users Declaration

General Considerations

The Global Information Society is in its infancy. Top priority
must therefore be given to measures encouraging its rapid
development, which in turn will contribute to economic growth,
increased employment and improved access to information for all.

The Information Society is not only characterised by a radical
change in technology, the most visible manifestation of which are
Global Information Networks, but also by its high potential to
strengthen social and democratic values. However, if this
potential is really to be profited from, “sovereignty in the
Information Society must”, as stated by the Information Society
Forum, “belong to the people, their preferences should determine
its uses and how the new technologies will be applied”. The
readiness to accept the Information Society and to endorse and
partake the incontestable advantages it offers people depends
therefore essentially on whether citizens feel that their
particular needs and interests are being taken into account and
met. In this context, new job opportunities are considered
essential.

Users are not homogenous. They range from individual private
consumers to large enterprises, and encompass a wide range of
cultural diversity. Consequently, users' needs vary and should not
be treated as it they were identical. One example may be
individual users who are in a much weaker position than large
commercial consumers. If the Information Society is to be truly
inclusive these differences and especially the particular position
of individual users with respect to large commercial consumers
must be taken into account. Users should be the driving force in
the development of Global Information Networks.

The following statements will take into account user viewpoints by
treating specific issues rather than individual user groups.

Putting People at the centre of the Information Society

Public policy should aim to eliminate the potential for social
exclusion and to ensure that all European citizens are able to
enjoy the benefits of the Information Society without threatening
traditional social and cultural values. As stated by the
Information Society Forum: “Sovereignty in the Information Society
must belong to the people – their preferences should determine its
uses and how the new technologies will be applied.” The positive
potential of technology to overcome existing societal divisions'
needs to be seen as a priority for all parties involved. If this
goal is not pro-actively pursued the results could be highly
detrimental in further polarising the divisions within society.

Global Information Networks and their technological realisation
have the potential to create a more inclusive society based upon
access to information. Global Information Networks can enable
marginalised groups - such as people in remote areas, people with
disabilities, people from ethnic minorities - to participate more
fully in everyday life through increased social contact, training,
and job opportunities available due to technological change.
However, this process needs to be fostered through positive action
which ensures access and training.

Dialogue , Stimulation and Promotion

Users are well aware that public policy makers and industry have
already gone to great lengths in stimulating and developing the
Information Society and Global Information Networks. Currently,
the technological side is leading the process and stronger user
participation is considered essential to bridge the current gap
and ensure successful deployment.

Users call for effective and accessible procedures to allow open,
constructive consultation between users, providers, the industry
(including SME's) and policy makers. It should be understood that
users are in favour of further development and are very interested
in what is happening in the IS, but need to be kept in touch with
the process.

Promotional activities and projects geared towards specific user
groups need to be encouraged to overcome fears of users which
mainly stem from lack of information.

Innovation should equally be stimulated by financial
encouragement, will full exploration of all possible options.

Affordability and Access

There is a need to ensure that Information Society services are
not only available to a small privileged group, who will be able
to afford them. In the short term, the process should be
encouraged by the development of public access points in local
communities, for example in public libraries.

The present drives to develop a concerted concept for Universal
Service need to take account of the rapid changes in technology
and users' needs. Clearly a more dynamic approach is required in
light of the convergence of technologies.

There is a need for a much higher degree of standardisation and
user friendliness in the design of new services.

Public Authorities

Official information from public authorities should be instantly
available electronically. The public right of access to official
information should besides be guaranteed by a legislation securing
Freedom of Information. In case government services are delivered
electronically, non electronic-forms of delivery of these services
should be maintained. The model of a democratic Information
Society must also include a non-commercial area of information
aimed at improving the participation of the citizen.

It is vital that public authorities provide a favourable
environment, which by necessity should include a reliable legal
and fiscal framework. This will mean a European framework within
which each National Government will be able to adapt its
regulation according to national priorities for building up the
confidence of the users and promoting the acceptance of the
Information Society. Governments and international organisations
should agree on a series of binding global principles.

Local and Regional Authorities

Local and regional authorities are the prime government interface
with citizens and are key players in the fight against social
exclusion, by also being the experimentation and demonstration
platform for public use of new technology. Consequently,
Information and Communication Technology cannot simply be regarded
as tools for improving “value for money” or the efficiency of
public administrations, but should rather be seen as opportunity
for improving the quality of living and working.

Security, Confidentiality & Data Protection

User information needs to be protected. This is a necessary
prerequisite if users are to feel confident and embrace the
Information Society and must include data protection at the
workplace.

It is therefore essential to apply and specify the existing data
protection principles in particular in view of the threats arising
out of the frightening potential for misuse of digital traces left
by the use of on-line services and the collection of marketing
data for instance by intelligent search agents bringing together
from thousands of Websites and Newsgroups all the available
information about an individual.

Individuals should exactly as in the off-line world have the right
to preserve their anonymity. Information should always be
collected for a specific and legitimate purpose, known and agreed
upon by the persons concerned and subsequently used only for aims
not incompatible with the initial collection purpose. Users should
have the right to choose the cryptographic method and
cryptographic level most appropriate for their specific purpose.

The Industry should be encouraged to develop and use technologies
and standards which minimise the need for processing personal data
by allowing to anonymise the electronic traces wherever
appropriate. In particular, anonymous payment systems and identity
protectors need to be offered. Secure systems of transmission of
data over networks must be available to the consumer at affordable
costs.

Intellectual Property and Media Pluralism

Strict ownership rules must apply to all providers of services
regardless of the transmission medium. Nevertheless, intellectual
property rights should not be used as a shield to engage in
anti-competitive practices by blocking access to public domain
information. Within national boundaries no single operator should
be able to control considerable portions of the market (30 %) in
which they operate. In this context, the market should be defined
on a functional basis (regional, national, etc.).

Reliability of Services and Information

The content of Global Information Networks needs to be fostered.
True value-added content, reflecting the rich diversity of Europe,
will not be created unless the market demands and advocates it.
The user and consumer must therefore be made aware of the
benefits, which can be drawn from these networks.

The citizens' rights to freedom of expression should be maintained
when treating content rules. Policy should ensure that existing
general law is made applicable to new information services. New
rules where they are needed need to be flexible and non-intrusive.
The ethical responsibility for the content and quality of
information rests with content providers themselves and therefore
must be discussed with users in a detailed manner. The Industry
should be encouraged to develop filtering and blocking
technologies to empower parents, teachers, and others to block
content that is inappropriate for children.

The current convergence of the market should be monitored
carefully in order to anticipate anti-competitive behaviour on the
supplier side through timely regulation. Action must be taken to
avoid creating market conditions which will lead to the
monopolisation of the Information Society by some players in the
game.

Consumer Protection and Regulation based upon
an Effective Consultation Process

There is clearly a need for a European framework within which each
National Governments will be able to formulate regulation adapted
to national priorities. Regulation is absolutely fundamental to
creating lasting confidence among users. Self-regulation should,
where appropriate, be encouraged. It is critical that this process
is coupled with the need for protection of the individual.

Users and suppliers must become partners towards the same end.
Simple co-existence is not enough – one can not exists without the
other. Transparency of the process is therefore the key.

Education and Training

The changing world demands to meet the needs not only of those who
are young and still in school but increasingly lots of others who
are older and need to acquire new skills, but have little
opportunity to do so through conventional education and training
systems. There is an urgent need to address the potential job
displacements, which may result from technological developments.
Moreover, people need to be sure that the labour market will offer
ample and fulfilling job opportunities in a fundamentally changed
environment.

The primary guarantee for continued job opportunity is adequate
qualification of individuals. Priority must therefore be given to
the creation of more training and skill developing opportunities,
permitting to use new and emerging networks and technology. These
efforts should be geared in such a way that groups which find
technology less appealing or even frightening are also addressed.
A proactive approach is needed towards equipping schools, and
vocational training systems, so that they have the capacity to
play an active part in building the Information Society.

There is a need to optimise the balance and complementarity
between Commission initiatives (in particular Structural Funds)
and those of National Governments. The challenge is to intervene
in ways that can turn the present vicious circle into a virtuous
one of self-sustaining development, helping the transition from
the teacher-centred pedagogy of the past to genuinely
learner-centred activity.

The energy that many National Governments are putting in to help
get their schools 'on-line' is encouraging, but there's so very
much to do! Perhaps it's a time for radical measures! Reform of
the Structural Funds might bring appropriate levels of investment
to the most important 'structure' of all, the infrastructure
through which our people learn to cope with their changing world.

Redress and Complaints Mechanisms

The lack of accountability by suppliers is still frightening many
users and inhibiting the more rapid diffusion and take-up of the
electronic commerce and the use of Global Information Networks in
general. The virtual world often makes the consumers feel as if
they have nowhere to turn in case of problems. Open and
understandable redress and complaint systems are therefore
necessary to increase and maintain the confidence in the new
environment. Effective mechanisms must be determined and placed in
a coherent framework.

Electronic Commerce

Global Information Networks will only be able to realise their
positive potential when individuals realise the value-added these
Networks can provide and have confidence in them. The readiness to
embark on electronic commerce but also to employ any other
technology application typical of the Information Society depends
crucially on the confidence of the users. Users' needs need to be
taken into account as a matter of urgency in this area and in
particular with regard to: advertising and marketing; contract
terms; pricing and billing; security of payments; security of
information; complaints and redress mechanisms; regulation and
enforcement.

-----------------------------------------------------